State v. Chambers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to arrest a person for a misdemeanor in the officer’s presence, “[a]n officer making an arrest may rely upon the collective knowledge of all the officers involved in the case.”
• mechanical stopwatch tested with a Vibrograph, which was in turn itself tested against another Vibrograph
• mechanical stopwatch tested with a Vibrograph, which was in turn itself tested against another Vibrograph
• mechanical stopwatch tested with a Vibrograph, which was in turn itself tested against another Vibrograph

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Penn v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-12-10· cited 59×
• State v. Ortega
  Washington Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 58×
• State v. Chambers
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-08-25· cited 41×
• State v. Mikie Ash
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1999-07-26· cited 20×
• State v. Marquez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-08-01· cited 13×
• State v. Chambers
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1992-07-17· cited 5×
• State v. Bravo Ortega
  Washington Supreme Court· 2013-03-21

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cook
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1965-03-06· cited 30×
• State v. Anderson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1979-07-24· cited 9×
• Poindexter v. Wolff
  D. Nebraska· 1975-11-04· cited 7×
• State v. Aden
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1976-05-12· cited 6×
• Edward Poindexter v. Charles L. Wolff, Jr., as Warden of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex in Lincoln, Nebraska
  Eighth Circuit· 1976-09-17· cited 5×