Nebraska Supreme Court· 12/24/1992
State v. Chambers
Citations
- 493 N.W.2d 328
- 242 Neb. 124
- 1992 Neb. LEXIS 356
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when words of statute not ambiguous, interpretation not only not necessary but will not be indulged
- when words of statute not ambiguous, interpretation not only not necessary but will not be indulged
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Omaha Public Power District v. Nebraska Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-09-08· cited 86×
- State v. WraggeNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-11-18· cited 43×
- Hamilton v. HamiltonNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-05· cited 21×
- Curry v. State Ex Rel. StenbergNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-05· cited 21×
- Department of Social Services v. C.B.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-05· cited 18×
- State v. MarchNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-03-14· cited 11×
- Fecht v. Bunnell Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-19· cited 7×
- State v. MarchNebraska Court of Appeals· 2001-01-30· cited 1×
- Crow v. ChelliNebraska Court of Appeals· 2020-02-11
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.