Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/12/1984
State v. Chambers
Citations
- 687 P.2d 805
- 69 Or. App. 681
- 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4011
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- officer’s observation that driver was having trouble lighting what officer thought was a pipe, without other evidence that pipe contained illegal drugs, did not support reasonable suspicion to justify traffic stop
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillette, Joseph, Van Hoomissen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ozhuwan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1990-02-09· cited 27×
- Provo City Corp. v. SpottsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1993-10-07· cited 16×
- State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-08-26· cited 12×
- State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 10×
- State v. OllerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-13· cited 9×
- State v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-12· cited 6×
- State v. LumsdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-26· cited 2×
- State v. HiblerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-07-13· cited 1×
- State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-03-13· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.