State v. Cermak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To sentence [appellant] consecutively [on five convictions of first-degree criminal sexual conduct involving five victims] does not exaggerate the criminality of his offense. To the contrary, a concurrent sentence in this instance would seem to do the opposite.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Branson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-02-28· cited 10×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pennsylvania v. Ritchie
  Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
• Coy v. Iowa
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
• State v. Norris
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-08-05· cited 61×
• Case v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-03-22· cited 61×
• State v. Cermak
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-05· cited 6×