Skip to main content
· 9/15/1997

State v. Cecil Grose

Citations

  • 982 S.W.2d 349
  • 1997 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 875
  • 1997 WL 567915

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the trial court had no duty to instruct the jury that the defendant‟s diminished capacity could be considered in determining whether he was capable of forming the requisite mental state for the offense
  • finding no error in the trial court’s refusal to give a specific charge on diminished capacity
  • no particular additional jury instruction on diminished capacity necessary where defendant introduced proof of his diminished mental abilities and jury was instructed on proper mens rea required for first degree murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Summers, Welles, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.