State v. Ceballos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the victim’s brother was entitled to restitution for expenses he “was subjected to” for the victim’s burial
• “But for the defendant’s criminally negligent homicide of the decedent, [the victim] would not have been subjected to those expenses. [The victim] therefore * * * incurred economic damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pumphrey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-05· cited 32×
• State v. Herfurth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-29· cited 23×
• State v. Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-26· cited 15×
• State v. Ferguson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-05· cited 5×
• State v. Haines
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-03· cited 1×