· 5/9/1963
State v. Cavness
Citations
- 381 P.2d 685
- 46 Haw. 470
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prosecutor improperly urged jury to draw unfavorable inference from defendant’s failure to call accomplice
- inference improper, when the missing witness is an accomplice or codefendant
- “When the Court has instructed that something which the[ jurors] have heard is not to be considered by them, we must presume in favor of their oath and public duty.” (Internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
- “When the Court has instructed that something which the[ jurors] have heard is not to be considered by them, we must presume in favor of their oath and public duty.” (Internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tsukiyama, Cassidy, Wirtz, Lewis, Mizuha
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.