Skip to main content
· 5/9/1963

State v. Cavness

Citations

  • 381 P.2d 685
  • 46 Haw. 470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prosecutor improperly urged jury to draw unfavorable inference from defendant’s failure to call accomplice
  • inference improper, when the missing witness is an accomplice or codefendant
  • “When the Court has instructed that something which the[ jurors] have heard is not to be considered by them, we must presume in favor of their oath and public duty.” (Internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
  • “When the Court has instructed that something which the[ jurors] have heard is not to be considered by them, we must presume in favor of their oath and public duty.” (Internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tsukiyama, Cassidy, Wirtz, Lewis, Mizuha

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.