State v. Caudle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that aggravating factors do not need to be charged in the indictment
• holding that aggravating factors do not need to be charged in the indictment
• “ ‘[T]he Fifth Amendment would not require aggravators, even if they were fundamental equivalents of elements of an offense, to be pled in a state-court indictment.’ ” (quoting Hunt, 357 N.C. at 272, 582 S.E.2d at 603)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Siers
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-04-19· cited 74×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Neder v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
• Washington v. Recuenco
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 1,105×
• State v. Allen
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2006-08-17· cited 31×