Skip to main content
· 3/6/2003

State v. Castillo-Salgado

Citations

  • 64 P.3d 1169
  • 186 Or. App. 605
  • 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that no search occurred where an officer observed illegal activity through a gap in kitchen window blinds as he approached a front door after his attention happened to be drawn by move- ment inside the apartment
  • an officer looking through a gap in the blinds when his attention was drawn by movements inside an apartment did not offend social norms
  • an officer looking through a gap in the blinds when his attention was drawn by movements inside an apartment did not offend social norms
  • “One indication of whether police conduct constitutes an impermissible invasion of privacy is whether the actions violate social norms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Kistler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.