State v. Castillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[m]erely the amount necessary to constitute [felony theft] has changed because of inflation\, not substance of the crime
• noting that \ [mjerely the amount necessary to constitute [felony theft] has changed because of inflation\, not substance of the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Frederick
  Washington Supreme Court· 1983-12-08· cited 31×
• State v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-09-11· cited 17×
• State v. Serr
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-06-13· cited 16×
• State v. Frederick
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-07-26· cited 14×
• Wasson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-10-08· cited 9×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Adams
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-11-22· cited 88×
• State v. Thomas
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-06-15· cited 50×
• In Re Harincar
  California Supreme Court· 1946-12-10· cited 36×
• State v. Jackovick
  Washington Supreme Court· 1960-10-13· cited 34×
• State v. Braxton
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-06-19· cited 18×
• Haislip v. Morris
  Washington Supreme Court· 1974-07-18· cited 10×
• People v. Irving
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1976-10-25· cited 5×