Skip to main content
· 4/24/2013

State v. Cassel

Citations

  • 419 S.W.3d 867
  • 2013 WL 1755493
  • 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • mentioning the indirect benefit an Austrian manufacturer got from an Oklahoma sub-tier distributor’s sales of the manufacturer’s product to Texas
  • mentioning the indirect benefit an Austrian manufacturer got from an Oklahoma sub-tier distributor’s sales of the manufacturer’s product to Texas
  • jurisdiction over manufacturer despite the presence of intervening steps in a distribution chain because manufacturer targeted forum state
  • noting Texas courts apply “stream of commerce plus” approach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bates, Scott, Sheffield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.