State v. Cason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here a veteran has lost his status as a benefits-eligible claimant, he must establish it anew by a preponderance of the evi dence.”
• “where a veteran has lost his status as a benefits-eligible claimant, he must establish it anew by a preponderance of the evidence”
• Court does not construe 38 U.S.C. § 6104(a), which provides for forfeiture of VA benefits upon evidence “satisfactory to the Secretary”, as bestowing unlimited, unreviewable discretion on the Secretary even though no statutory or regulatory factors or considerations are provided
• forfeiture under 38 U.S.C. § 6104(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).