Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 1/15/2019
State v. Casey
Citations
- 823 S.E.2d 906
- 263 N.C. App. 510
Syllabus
Vouching Credibility Invited Error Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Motion for Appropriate Relief Cross-Examination Sexual Abuse Expert Trial Counsel Appellate Counsel
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining it is “deficient performance” when appellate counsel fails to raise a claim “that was plainly stronger than those presented to the appellate court”
- indicating it is deficient performance if appellate counsel failed to raise an issue that was “plainly stronger” than the issues actually raised on appeal
- stating “failing to raise a claim on appeal that was plainly stronger than those presented to the appellate court is deficient performance” (emphasis in original) (citing Davila v. Davis, 582 U.S. 521, 533, 198 L.Ed.2d 603, 615 (2017)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dillon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- Smith v. MurraySupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,683×
- Davila v. DavisSupreme Court· 2017-06-26· cited 1,306×
- State v. HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-08-17· cited 20×
- State v. CollingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-04-17· cited 15×
- State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2009-02-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.