State v. Casey
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 790
Syllabus
Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel when his trial counsel did not object to various alleged hearsay statements where many of the statements were either non-hearsay statements or exceptions to rule against hearsay. Appellant also did not receive ineffective assistance when his trial counsel failed to object to the expert testimony of an educated and experienced social worker and forensic interviewer since she would have been classified as an expert by the trial court. Appellant's trial counsel did not provide deficient representation that subjected appellant to any resulting prejudice.
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-05· cited 802×
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-08· cited 369×
- State v. KinsworthyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-14· cited 50×
- State v. HendrixOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-03· cited 50×
- State v. ClarkeOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-03· cited 49×
- State v. BurnsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-20· cited 46×
- State v. GravesOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-28· cited 42×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-09· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.