Utah Supreme Court· 3/12/2002

State v. Casey

Citations

2002 UT 29
44 P.3d 756
443 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
2002 Utah LEXIS 34
2002 WL 377479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding trial court remedied prosecutor's failure to convey victim's opposition to plea when it reopened plea at sentencing, afforded victim opportunity to state objection to reduced charge, and reaffirmed prior plea agreement
when victim was denied right to make statement at plea hearing, trial court properly determined that remedy was to \ 'informally' \ reopen the plea hearing at sentencing and accept testimony from victim
“Our rules allowing discretionary review provide parties an opportunity to convince an appellate court that the issue raised is so important that review prior to full adjudication of the case is justified or that the order will escape review altogether if an appeal is not allowed.”
“Our rules allowing discretionary review provide parties an opportunity to convince an appellate court that the issue raised is so important that review prior to full adjudication of the case is justified or that the order will escape review altogether if an appeal is not allowed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durrant, Wilkins, Howe, Russon, Durham, Durrant'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.