Skip to main content

State v. Casey

Citations

  • 263 Minn. 47
  • 115 N.W.2d 749
  • 1962 Minn. LEXIS 750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a landowner is not entitled to recover compensation from the state for damages which he could mitigate, but also concluding that mitigation measures that are too speculative will not be required
  • testimony based on use as a gravel mine for 7 years, and then as a commercial building site, was admissible
  • the extent of a mitigation duty depends on the facts of each case, and the question of admissibility of evidence is a matter within the discretion of the trial court
  • the extent of a mitigation duty depends on the facts of each case, and the question of admissibility of evidence is a matter within the discretion of the trial court
  • trial court correctly excluded evidence of a replacement tunnel for a gravel conveyor where no evidence that construction would be physically possible or would be approved by the state highway authority
  • trial court correctly excluded evidence of a replacement tunnel for a gravel conveyor where no evidence that construction would be physically possible or would be approved by the state highway authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.