Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/8/1962
State v. Casey
Citations
- 263 Minn. 47
- 115 N.W.2d 749
- 1962 Minn. LEXIS 750
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a landowner is not entitled to recover compensation from the state for damages which he could mitigate, but also concluding that mitigation measures that are too speculative will not be required
- testimony based on use as a gravel mine for 7 years, and then as a commercial building site, was admissible
- the extent of a mitigation duty depends on the facts of each case, and the question of admissibility of evidence is a matter within the discretion of the trial court
- the extent of a mitigation duty depends on the facts of each case, and the question of admissibility of evidence is a matter within the discretion of the trial court
- trial court correctly excluded evidence of a replacement tunnel for a gravel conveyor where no evidence that construction would be physically possible or would be approved by the state highway authority
- trial court correctly excluded evidence of a replacement tunnel for a gravel conveyor where no evidence that construction would be physically possible or would be approved by the state highway authority
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frank T. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-09-05· cited 43×
- State v. Gannons Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-10-07· cited 38×
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. StromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-18· cited 26×
- City of St. Paul, a Municipal Corporation v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway Company, and Chicago and Northwestern Railway CompanyEighth Circuit· 1969-07-02· cited 13×
- Sports Page, Inc. v. First Union Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-04-18· cited 12×
- Gibson v. Commissioner of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-07-03· cited 11×
- State Ex Rel. Lord v. North Star Concrete Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1963-06-07· cited 11×
- State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-09-29· cited 10×
- Hamilton v. KillianSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-05-25· cited 8×
- City of St. Louis Park v. Almor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-17· cited 8×
- King v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-11-21· cited 6×
- State v. WeiswasserNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-02-02· cited 4×
- Lerner v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-06-20· cited 2×
- Frantz v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF ANOKA COUNTYSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-08-03· cited 2×
- State v. Gannons Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-08-19· cited 1×
- Vierling v. Independent School District No. 720Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-06-05
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court· 1922-12-11· cited 1,990×
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1934-04-30· cited 907×
- Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1895-04-30· cited 80×
- Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1955-02-25· cited 65×
- State v. PahlSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1959-02-20· cited 31×
- Plummer v. MoldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1875-05-22· cited 25×
- L. Realty Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1904-06-17· cited 15×
- Electric Short Line Terminal Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-04-09· cited 13×
- Regents of the University of Minnesota v. IrwinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-03-27· cited 12×
- Morgan v. City of Albert LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1915-03-12· cited 9×
- Board of Education v. Heywood Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1923-02-09· cited 7×
- Town of Glencoe v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1904-12-23· cited 6×
- Berg v. Village of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1919-07-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.