State v. Casey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Idaho's hunter harassment statute unconstitutionally overbroad because it impermissibly regulated the viewpoint of an anti-hunting advocate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Sanders
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-06-18· cited 43×
• Simpson v. Cenarrusa
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1997-08-07· cited 27×
• Binkowski v. State
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-06-24· cited 19×
• State v. Branson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1996-06-07· cited 19×
• State v. Guerrero
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1997-07-14· cited 5×
• State v. Thompson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2001-05-10· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Broadrick v. Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
• Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
• United States v. O'Brien
  Supreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 3,604×
• Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent
  Supreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 2,188×
• R. A. v. v. City of St. Paul
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 2,052×
• City of Houston v. Hill
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 1,428×
• Regan v. Time, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 510×
• State v. Newman
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1985-01-31· cited 81×
• Robert T. Magill v. Dennis M. Lynch
  First Circuit· 1977-07-25· cited 73×
• State v. Bitt
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1990-09-13· cited 63×
• Gardner v. Evans
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1986-05-22· cited 43×
• City of Lewiston v. Mathewson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1956-11-13· cited 37×
• Voyles v. City of Nampa
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1976-04-22· cited 30×