Skip to main content

State v. Carver

Citations

  • 380 N.W.2d 821
  • 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 3916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • children’s hearsay statements to doctor not sufficiently reliable where children were interviewed together and asked leading questions
  • “[T]he trial court properly admitted the statements made by [the] children because their trial testimony was largely consistent with their earlier statements and [the defendant] had an opportunity to cross-examine them.”
  • \[T]he trial court properly admitted the statements made by [the] children because their trial testimony was largely consistent with their earlier statements and [the defendant] had an opportunity to cross-examine them.\
  • “The only positive evidence that the jury could have relied on . . . had to be the hearsay statements we have already held inadmissible. Those convictions are accordingly reversed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.