State v. Carruth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Unless the challenged legislation, by its terms, regulates the exercise of first amendment rights, its constitutionality may not be challenged on the ground that it might apply to parties not before the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Matter of Cause No. Mh-90-00566
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-09-03· cited 29×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-10-13· cited 28×
• Cacavas v. Bowen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-03-19· cited 24×
• State v. Lycett
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-07-29· cited 19×
• State v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-03-13· cited 14×
• State v. Deskins
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-08-19· cited 11×
• State v. Trachtman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-07-31· cited 6×
• State v. Scotia
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-07-18· cited 4×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-11-19· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Broadrick v. Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
• Grayned v. City of Rockford
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,166×
• Dandridge v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 3,777×
• Eisenstadt v. Baird
  Supreme Court· 1972-03-22· cited 1,851×
• Gooding v. Wilson
  Supreme Court· 1972-03-23· cited 1,392×
• Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 1,283×
• Coates v. City of Cincinnati
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 1,269×
• Bigelow v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 767×
• Plummer v. City of Columbus
  Supreme Court· 1973-10-15· cited 53×
• State v. Darby
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-06-07· cited 17×