Skip to main content
· 10/31/1977

State v. Carriker

Citations

  • 238 S.E.2d 678
  • 269 S.C. 553
  • 1977 S.C. LEXIS 336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the objections of one defendant are not imputable to a co-defendant
  • finding issue unpreserved because it was not raised by the appellant
  • “While appellant’s co-defendant did object, the appellant may not utilize the objection of another defendant to gain review.”
  • “While appellant’s co-defendant did object, the appellant may not utilize the objection of another defendant to gain review.”
  • appellant may not use the objection of another defendant to gain review
  • appellant cannot utilize objection of another to gain appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.