State v. Carr

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 3802

Syllabus

Appeal from multiple post-judgment decisions of the trial court is not well taken. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's motion to stay the payment of restitution pending resolution of appellant's direct appeal or by denying appellant's request for production of jury verdict forms bearing names of jurors. In addition, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's request for transcripts of grand jury testimony where appellant had no postconviction petition pending and did not demonstrate a particularized need for the material requested. Finally, the trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion for reconsideration of a post-judgment decision while appellant's appeal from the same decision already was pending. Judgment affirmed.