Skip to main content

State v. Carr

Citations

  • 53 P.3d 843
  • 274 Kan. 442
  • 2002 Kan. LEXIS 547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that probation is distinct from a sentence because it does not increase or decrease the sentence required to be imposed by statute and is a privilege rather than a constitutional right
  • \This court has repeatedly held that probation is separate and distinct from the sentence.\
  • distinguishing between judgment of sentence and judgment of probation revocation
  • probation is a disposition alternate to the serving of a sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett, Six, Davis, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.