State v. Carnicom

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 1675

Syllabus

Conviction for violating a temporary protection order was supported by the evidence where the state established that the defendant \harassed\ the victim by calling her incessantly from jail. Also, trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of other phone calls that predated the order because the calls were relevant to establishing the defendant's criminal intent and were not prejudicial.