State v. Carmona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• habeas proceeding, not motion to correct illegal sentence, is proper method to raise claim concerning presentence confinement credit
• habeas proceeding, rather than motion to cor- rect illegal sentence, proper method to assert claim concerning presentence confinement credit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Crawford v. Commissioner of Correction
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-11-24· cited 76×
• State v. Koslik
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-09-01· cited 28×
• State v. Wright
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-04-22· cited 12×
• State v. Hurdle
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2023-01-31· cited 7×
• Borrelli v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-21· cited 5×
• Carmona v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-09-09· cited 4×
• State v. Brown
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-08-27· cited 4×
• State v. Riddick
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-11-05· cited 2×
• State v. Carmona
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-01-09
• State v. Nusser
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-04-21

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Abed v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-09-17· cited 93×
• State v. Lawrence
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-01-30· cited 62×
• State v. Casiano
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-05-29· cited 56×
• Harris v. Commissioner of Correction
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-11-30· cited 49×
• State v. Alexander
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-05-25· cited 26×
• Wright v. Commissioner of Correction
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-08-14· cited 19×
• Casey v. Commissioner of Correction
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-07-24· cited 12×