State v. Carlton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proposition that thief cannot be convicted of receiving stolen property that the thief stole \is without contradiction\ and based on \logical reason that one cannot receive something from one's self\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bishop
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-01-28· cited 36×
• Garcia v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1989-07-13· cited 23×
• Pierce v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-04-23· cited 18×
• State v. Winslow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-07-23· cited 18×
• State v. Dechand
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-06-25· cited 15×
• CARDIEL
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 2009-07-01· cited 15×
• Eliason v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1973-07-09· cited 14×
• State v. Doster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-05-10· cited 11×
• Hayes v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-07-14· cited 9×
• State v. Stuart
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-06-14· cited 7×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-02-19· cited 5×
• Saathoff v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1999-11-19· cited 4×
• State v. Schoene
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-07-27· cited 4×
• State v. Molatore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-09-10· cited 4×
• State v. Rogers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-11-29· cited 3×
• State v. McPherson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-24· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Milanovich v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 308×
• People v. Daghita
  New York Court of Appeals· 1950-07-11· cited 63×
• State v. Pomeroy
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1896-11-09· cited 41×
• State v. Carden
  Washington Supreme Court· 1957-03-14· cited 11×