State v. Carlson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a “party seeking review has a duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary to consider the questions presented”
• noting that it is “elementary that a party seeking review has a duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary to consider the questions presented”
• state could not appeal based on record failing to show existing prosecution for violation of state law rather than municipal ordinance.
• “It is elementary that a party seeking review has a duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary to consider the questions presented.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McLeod
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-11-17· cited 23×
• State v. Grigsby
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-08-15· cited 11×
• Bonynge v. City of Minneapolis
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-10-18· cited 2×
• Wicker v. City of Maplewood
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-12-17· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Truesdale v. Friedman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-03-06· cited 15×
• State v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-02-23· cited 8×