Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 6/11/1985
State v. Carlson
Citations
- 369 N.W.2d 326
- 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding two black eyes, a bloody nose, bruises, and scratches constitute substantial bodily harm
- two black eyes, facial bruises, bruises on neck and head, and scratches on arm were sufficient for jury to conclude victim sustained substantial bodily harm
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Popovich, Wozniak, Randall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-17· cited 133×
- Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1956-03-09· cited 53×
- State v. HelenboltSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-06-03· cited 22×
- State v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-01-08· cited 19×
- State v. MichaeloffSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-10-15· cited 12×
- State v. CampionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-07-03· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.