Skip to main content

State v. Carey

Citations

  • 274 P.3d 21
  • 152 Idaho 720
  • 2012 WL 1186006
  • 2012 Ida. App. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no authority “holds that a sentencing court must strike from a PSI any statement that the defendant disputes”
  • holding no authority requires that “a sentencing court must strike from a PSI any statement that the defendant disputes”
  • noting no authority provides court must strike information from PSI because defendant disputes information
  • noting no authority provides court must strike information from PSI because defendant disputes information
  • noting no authority provides court must strike information from PSI because defendant disputes information
  • noting unfounded, unreliable, or inaccurate information must be rejected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Gratton, Gutierrez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.