State v. Cardwell
Citations
- 90 Kan. 606
- 135 P. 597
- 1913 Kan. LEXIS 273
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Statutory Rape — Corpus Delicti May be Proven by Circumstantial Evidence. On the trial of a criminal action the corpus delicti — that some one has committed the crime charged —may be proven in whole or in part by circumstantial evidence the same as any other fact in controversy; the rule being that the best evidence which, in the nature of the case, is attainable should be produced, and it must be so conclusive as to ex-, elude all reasonable doubt, to sustain a conviction.</p> <p>2. New Trial — Newly Discovered Evidence — No Diligence Shown. A motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, where the affidavits disclose that the defendant knew before the trial the facts proposed to be proven, and having testified on the trial he made no mention of such facts nor made any effort to secure the attendance of the proposed witnesses, is properly overruled.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “That a bald confession of one that he has committed a certain crime, without other evidence or circumstances to corroborate the confession, will sustain a conviction is, we believe, nowhere contended.”
- applying a sufficiency of the evidence standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1959-06-01· cited 182×
- State v. DernSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-25· cited 118×
- State v. DoyleSupreme Court of Kansas· 1968-06-08· cited 65×
- State v. OswaldSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-07-14· cited 56×
- State v. TillerySupreme Court of Kansas· 1980-03-01· cited 44×
- State v. Francis Noboru YoshidaHawaii Supreme Court· 1960-07-29· cited 43×
- State v. HernandezArizona Supreme Court· 1958-01-21· cited 37×
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-05-03· cited 31×
- State v. HigdonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1978-10-28· cited 16×
- State v. FrySupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-10-11· cited 12×
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas· 1962-06-09· cited 11×
- State v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-05-02· cited 8×
- State v. HuppSupreme Court of Kansas· 1941-11-08· cited 8×
- Basham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1959-05-27· cited 6×
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Kansas· 1962-03-03· cited 3×
- United States v. FullerDistrict of Columbia· 1965-06-15· cited 3×
- Limbird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1959-06-10
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas· 2026-04-24
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.