State v. Cardona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering issue not raised in timely filed statement of errors, because district court’s order showed it considered and ruled upon issue
• both district court and higher appellate court generally review appeals from county court for error appearing on record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Houser v. American Paving Asphalt
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2018-02-16· cited 24×
• State v. Trampe
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2003-09-02· cited 7×
• State v. Miller
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2002-09-17· cited 5×
• McNamee v. MARRIOTT RESERVATION CENTER
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2008-04-01· cited 1×
• State v. Koncaba
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2004-02-10· cited 1×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Louthan
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1999-06-25· cited 206×
• State v. Irish
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1986-10-10· cited 199×
• State v. Buckman
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-07-07· cited 122×
• State v. Paul
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1999-04-09· cited 74×
• State v. Hays
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1997-12-05· cited 50×
• State v. Gutierrez
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2001-01-05· cited 48×
• State v. Trackwell
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-05-10· cited 45×
• State v. Mitjans
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-06-26· cited 43×
• State v. Powers
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2001-06-12· cited 37×
• State v. Lobato
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-05-26· cited 37×
• State v. Hopkins
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-11-17· cited 25×
• State v. White
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 14×
• State v. Coleman
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2001-07-10· cited 12×