Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 4/5/1995
State v. Card
Citations
- 104 Md. App. 439
- 656 A.2d 400
- 1995 Md. App. LEXIS 78
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming vicarious liability judgment against State for torts of sheriff classified as “state personnel”
- “There is nothing in [MTCA] itself, or in its history, suggesting an intent that the State be liable for the conduct of persons other than those included within the definition of ‘State personnel.’ ”
- “There is nothing in the [MTCA] itself, or in its history, suggesting an intent that the State be liable for the conduct of persons other than those included within the definition of ‘State personnel.’”
- “There is nothing in [the MTCA] itself, or in its history, suggesting an intent that the State be liable for the conduct of persons other than those included within the definition of ‘State personnel.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Proctor v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-12· cited 84×
- Ford v. Baltimore City Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-27· cited 38×
- Tavakoli-Nouri v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-08-30· cited 32×
- Estate of Burris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-14· cited 10×
- Dorsey v. SokoloffD. Maryland· 2019-05-17· cited 8×
- Conaway v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-01· cited 8×
- Kent County, State of Md. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-07-16· cited 7×
- TOLLENGER v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-05· cited 2×
- (1996)Maryland Attorney General Reports· 1996-06-24
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Clea v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-06-09· cited 160×
- Rucker v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-06· cited 78×
- Foor v. Juvenile Services AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-03· cited 74×
- State of Maryland, Dept. of N. Res. v. Amerada Hess Corp.D. Maryland· 1972-09-22· cited 37×
- Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-05-09· cited 26×
- State v. MeadeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-09-01· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.