State v. Carbajal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘The trial court is in the best position to determine the evidence surrounding the aggravating and mitigating factors and which factors should be given credence.”
• “The consideration of mitigating circumstances is entirely within the discretion of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-11-25· cited 41×
• State v. Jenkins
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-08-06· cited 31×
• In Re Kory L.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-05-18· cited 15×
• State of Arizona v. Evan McCarrick Jerald
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-04-15

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bly
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-11-18· cited 107×
• State v. Iniguez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-04-11· cited 51×
• State v. Morris
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-02-18· cited 29×
• State v. Marquez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-08-19· cited 24×
• State v. Webb
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-01-09· cited 21×
• State v. Cawley
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-05-26· cited 19×
• State v. Fatty
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-05-20· cited 19×
• State v. Shuler
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-09-19· cited 10×