Skip to main content
· 8/17/2018

State v. Caplette

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 3285

Syllabus

Pursuant to Evid.R. 404(B), the trial court did not err in admitting evidence regarding the prior acts of the appellant, as the danger of unfair prejudice was minimal and the evidence was clearly probative of whether appellant had knowledge that his accomplice intended to burglarize the victims' residence when they arrived there. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.