State v. Canup

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The “reasonable hypothesis” rule codified in OCGA § 24-4-6 “applies only when the evidence against the accused was entirely circumstantial.”
• The “reasonable hypothesis” rule codified in OCGA § 24-4-6 “applies only when the evidence against the accused was entirely circumstantial.”
• evidence that defendant had been living at a new address for two weeks without notifying local authorities as required was sufficient to support his conviction for violating OCGA § 42-1-12
• reasonable hypothesis rule applies only when the evidence against the accused is entirely circumstantial
• Circumstantial evidence rule only applies when the evidence is entirely circumstantial.
• “Because there is no provision in Georgia law authorizing a trial court to entertain a motion for judgment of not guilty notwithstanding a verdict of guilty in a criminal case, the court’s action [granting such relief] was procedurally unauthorized.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).