Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/4/2016
State v. Cantrell
Citations
- 2016 Ohio 7623
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In Ohio, opening a closed but unlocked door amounts to sufficient force to prove the element of force in the offense of Burglary”
- “In Ohio, opening a closed but unlocked door amounts to sufficient force to prove the element of force in the offense of Burglary”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BallOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-16· cited 8×
- State v. BrockOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-09· cited 8×
- State v. AlberstonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-25· cited 7×
- State v. StoneOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-19· cited 6×
- State v. SteenOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-25· cited 4×
- State v. PacificOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-26· cited 3×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-16· cited 3×
- State v. SpellsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-27· cited 2×
- State v. CantrellOhio Supreme Court· 2017-05-17
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.