Washington Supreme Court· 6/30/1994
State v. Cantrell
Citations
- 875 P.2d 1208
- 124 Wash. 2d 183
- 1994 Wash. LEXIS 394
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a lowered expectation of privacy limits the relative rights of co-occupants to prevent a search of common areas
- “RAP 2.5(a)(3) is not intended to afford criminal defendants a means for obtaining new trials whenever they can identify some constitutional issue not raised before the trial court.”
- \warrantless searches can be used against a nonconsenting defendant\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andersen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ArmentaWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 270×
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court· 2001-02-02· cited 164×
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court· 1999-11-04· cited 157×
- State v. FafordWashington Supreme Court· 1996-02-01· cited 48×
- State v. KealeyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-12-19· cited 45×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-01-23· cited 16×
- State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-10-10· cited 15×
- State Of Washington v. Norman Granvel RooneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-10-13· cited 15×
- State Of Washington v. William Witkowski & Tina BervenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-04-24· cited 14×
- State v. KealeyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-02-26· cited 10×
- State v. O'DAYCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-05-28· cited 7×
- State v. HoggattCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-08-31· cited 7×
- State v. VanhollebekeWashington Supreme Court· 2018-03-15· cited 6×
- State Of Washington, V. Jerome Isaiah GarnerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-05-31· cited 4×
- State of Washington v. Justin Dean VanhollebekeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-12-13· cited 3×
- State Of Washington v. Carmen Rose LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-02-25· cited 3×
- State v. FREEPONSCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-12-11· cited 2×
- Richard Wilkinson v. Washington Medical CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2025-09-16
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 1,052×
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,012×
- State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 292×
- State v. HouserWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 235×
- City of Seattle v. MesianiWashington Supreme Court· 1988-05-12· cited 144×
- State v. WetheredWashington Supreme Court· 1988-05-12· cited 138×
- United States v. Robert B. French (90-6222) Jay C. Emerson (90-6407) James W. Caldwell (90-6408) Kenneth L. Foster (90-6477)Sixth Circuit· 1992-09-25· cited 127×
- United States v. Dale Eldridge, Also Known as Dale Smith, United States of America v. John David Fuget, Also Known as Poncho ProfferEighth Circuit· 1993-01-29· cited 121×
- State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court· 1989-11-30· cited 106×
- United States v. LangstonTenth Circuit· 1992-07-02· cited 96×
- Collier v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 79×
- State v. ShoemakerWashington Supreme Court· 1975-03-20· cited 70×
- United States v. Joseph Horton and Willie F. JordanFifth Circuit· 1974-01-03· cited 68×
- United States v. AndersonThird Circuit· 1988-10-21· cited 68×
- United States v. Darrell C. BaldwinFifth Circuit· 1981-05-04· cited 62×
- United States v. Lorgio D. Morales, Jr. United States of America v. Luis L. Viera. United States of America v. Luis L. VieraThird Circuit· 1988-11-16· cited 54×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.