State v. Cantrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• followed Supreme Court holding that imposition of consecutive sentences for violation of two separate statutes in one criminal transaction is not barred by double jeopardy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gibson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-06-14· cited 53×
• Baker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-08· cited 44×
• Torrence v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-04· cited 34×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-05· cited 20×
• Rodriquez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-15· cited 16×
• Glenn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-11-30· cited 11×
• Carr v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-10· cited 7×
• Doggett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-05· cited 7×
• Ferguson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-09-09· cited 7×
• State v. McNab
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-19· cited 4×
• Kraus v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-30· cited 2×
• Garmon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-26· cited 1×
• Giddings v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-08· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Albernaz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 1,588×
• Borges v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-04-08· cited 116×
• Cantrell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-02-11· cited 8×