State v. Cannon
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3941
Syllabus
NEW TRIAL: The common pleas court erred in denying on the merits defendant's proposed Crim.R. 33(A)(6) motion for a new trial, after overruling his Crim.R. 33(B) motion for leave to file the new-trial motion out of time, because Crim.R. 33(B) permits a new-trial motion to be filed out of time only after leave has been granted. The common pleas court abused its discretion in overruling without an evidentiary hearing defendant's Crim.R. 33(B) motion for leave to file a Crim.R. 33(A)(6) motion for a new trial, when the motion, on its face, showed that defendant had been unavoidably prevented from timely discovering, and from timely presenting in a new-trial motion, newly discovered evidence of actual innocence.
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 1967-12-20· cited 61×
- State v. CarusoneOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-15· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.