State v. Canney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that RSA 262:23 is aimed, in part, at discouraging repeated traffic violations and punishing habitual offenders
• describing the habitual offender statute, in part, as “part of a statutory scheme enacted to promote maximum safety on this State’s roadways”
• stating the general rule that a \defendant may not collaterally attack an [administrative] habitual offender determination\ in a criminal enforcement action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. O'Brien
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-12-29· cited 17×
• State v. Crotty
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-10-09· cited 12×
• State v. Rix
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-10-10· cited 9×
• State v. Grondin
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-08-30· cited 6×
• State v. Riendeau
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-05-20· cited 3×
• Hammell v. Warden, NHSP
  D. New Hampshire· 2001-08-09

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Tucker
  Supreme Court· 1972-01-11· cited 2,508×
• Burgett v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,632×
• Lewis v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 843×
• United States v. Mendoza-Lopez
  Supreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 703×
• State v. O'Neill.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-03-07· cited 17×
• State v. Cook
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-08-27· cited 14×
• State v. Buckwold
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-02-12· cited 7×
• State v. Lemire
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-08-27· cited 3×