Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/29/1977
State v. Canez
Citations
- 575 P.2d 817
- 118 Ariz. 187
- 1977 Ariz. App. LEXIS 829
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing the court’s comments at sentencing as “an explanation by the court of why it would not impose a more severe penalty”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hathaway, Howard, Richmond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-09-17· cited 36×
- State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-09-09· cited 10×
- State v. WeinerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-06-10· cited 9×
- State of Arizona v. Glen Leo GagnonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-12-03· cited 4×
- State v. MussiahCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-08-02· cited 2×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. RusterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-04-14· cited 106×
- State v. RiceArizona Supreme Court· 1973-12-14· cited 54×
- Huff v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1973-03-05· cited 48×
- State v. LenahanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-07-13· cited 28×
- American Home Life Insurance v. HeideSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-11-13· cited 12×
- State v. MarcusArizona Supreme Court· 1969-02-13· cited 9×
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-01-26· cited 8×
- Sykes v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-12-26· cited 6×
- State v. WrightArizona Supreme Court· 1976-07-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.