State v. Canedo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summarizing rales that general reputation of victim as violent was admissible to establish the identity of the aggressor and defendant’s state of mind and specific acts known by defendant admissible to show defendant’s state of mind

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bracy
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-06-10· cited 96×
• State v. Kennedy
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-01-30· cited 32×
• State v. Canedo
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-11· cited 22×
• State v. Zamora
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-05-03· cited 17×
• State v. Birdsall
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-05-17· cited 15×
• State v. Gambrell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-05-03· cited 9×
• State v. Carter
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-02-06· cited 4×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Harvill
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-11-16· cited 126×
• Lawrence v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1925-11-06· cited 60×
• State v. Griffin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-08· cited 45×
• McCandless v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1916-05-19· cited 44×
• State v. Wallace
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1957-12-17· cited 36×
• State v. Jackson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-05-29· cited 34×
• State v. Whitaker
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-12-22· cited 25×
• Campbell v. Territory of Arizona
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1912-06-25· cited 24×
• State v. Young
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-03-30· cited 23×
• Mendez v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1924-11-03· cited 18×
• Murphy v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1928-03-05· cited 5×
• Lepker v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1932-05-16· cited 5×
• Burgen v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1927-05-23· cited 3×