Skip to main content
· 7/24/1998

State v. Canaan

Citations

  • 964 P.2d 681
  • 265 Kan. 835
  • 1998 Kan. LEXIS 407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Florida, California, and Alabama all permit the introduction of evidence that is presumptive for blood
  • noting that Florida, California, and Alabama all permit the introduction of evidence that is presumptive for blood
  • evidence of presumptive tests admitted where confirmatory testing established that substance causing reaction was blood
  • evidence of presumptive tests admitted where confirmatory testing established that substance causing reaction was blood
  • defendant was not in custody where he was alone for significant periods of time and was not arrested at hospital; purpose of officers’ presence at hospital was to determine when defendant would be released so they could later question him
  • the luminol test for the presence of blood

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.