· 7/24/1998
State v. Canaan
Citations
- 964 P.2d 681
- 265 Kan. 835
- 1998 Kan. LEXIS 407
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Florida, California, and Alabama all permit the introduction of evidence that is presumptive for blood
- noting that Florida, California, and Alabama all permit the introduction of evidence that is presumptive for blood
- evidence of presumptive tests admitted where confirmatory testing established that substance causing reaction was blood
- evidence of presumptive tests admitted where confirmatory testing established that substance causing reaction was blood
- defendant was not in custody where he was alone for significant periods of time and was not arrested at hospital; purpose of officers’ presence at hospital was to determine when defendant would be released so they could later question him
- the luminol test for the presence of blood
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lockett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.