State v. Camperud

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that UPUA (formerly referred to as RICE) was “modeled after the federal ‘RICO’ statute”
• recognizing that \in some circumstances the nature of the error involved is such that [the] de facto burden [placed on the accused to show prejudice] should be shifted and. the State required to persuade us that the error was harmless\
• noting that a particular statute “lends itself to confusion” and explaining that “[a]ppellate review of such cases would be greatly enhanced” by the use of special verdict forms
• noting that “this Court has never squarely decided whether violations of the Utah Constitution must be addressed under the federal constitutional standard of 'harmless beyond a reasonable doubt1 ”
• addressing issue in interest of judicial economy, since issue likely to recur, to provide trial court with guidance
• addressing issue in interest of judicial economy, since issue likely to recur, to provide trial court- with guidance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).