State v. Campbell
Citations
- 73 Kan. 688
- 85 P. 784
- 1906 Kan. LEXIS 308
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Criminal Law — Right to Speedy Trial — Delay Occasioned by an Appeal. The terms of court which intervene pending an appeal by the state in a criminal action are not to be counted in determining whether a person under indictment and held to bail is entitled to be discharged under section 221 of the code of criminal procedure (Gen. Stat. 1901, § 5666) because not brought to trial before the end of the third term of court after indictment found or information filed.'</p> <p>2. -• Confessions — Statements before a Grand Jury. Statements and declarations by a defendant in a criminal action in denial of guilt while a witness before a grand jury are not confessions within the rule requiring them first to be shown to have been made voluntarily before they are competent evidence against him.</p> <p>3. - Testimony in Response to a Subpoena Not Involuntary —Waiver of Privilege. The fact that his testimony before the grand jury was in obedience to a subpcena will not render such statements or declarations involuntary. His rights are protected by his privilege to refuse to answer when the answer tends to incriminate him; and by the failure to exercise his privilege in this respect his statements and declarations become voluntary.</p> <p>4. -Admissions — Voluntary Statements o.f an Exculpatory Nature. Voluntary statements of fact made by a defendant in a criminal action, which do not tend to establish his guilt but which are exculpatory in their nature, are competent evidence against him as admissions of a party.</p> <p>5. - Grand Jurors — Disclosure of Evidence Given before Them. The language of section 5535 of the General Statutes of 1901,' providing that “no grand juror shall disclose any evidence given before the grand jury, nor the name of any witness who appeared before them, except when lawfully required to testify as a witness in relation thereto,” is not limited by the provisions of section 5533 of the General Statutes of 1901, permitt
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- criminal defendant’s exculpatory statements while testifying before the grand jury were admissions, not confessions, and, therefore, could be admitted into evidence against him without a preliminary showing that they were voluntarily made
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Porter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-03-13· cited 738×
- Lawrence v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1925-11-06· cited 60×
- State v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court· 1956-06-12· cited 53×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-01-28· cited 48×
- Ex Parte Clyde MeadowsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1941-03-26· cited 43×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1910-06-11· cited 39×
- Steen v. First Nat. BankEighth Circuit· 1924-03-18· cited 37×
- State v. HessSupreme Court of Kansas· 1956-12-08· cited 34×
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-01-15· cited 31×
- Mannon v. FrickSupreme Court of Missouri· 1956-11-12· cited 30×
- State v. ManzellaOregon Supreme Court· 1988-07-26· cited 22×
- State v. ArtzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1923-01-12· cited 21×
- State v. Marshall & Brown-Sidorowicz, P.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1978-04-14· cited 20×
- State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court· 1961-03-22· cited 20×
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1942-01-24· cited 18×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1958-03-08· cited 16×
- Whaley v. VidalSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1911-06-28· cited 16×
- Swift v. Kelso Feed Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1946-05-04· cited 16×
- O'NEAL v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1970-02-25· cited 15×
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1957-12-07· cited 13×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals· 1901-10-15· cited 2,413×
- State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court· 1895-01-14· cited 87×
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-01-15· cited 62×
- Bedell v. HerringCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-12-26· cited 57×
- Hendrickson v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals· 1854-04-05· cited 56×
- People v. NortheyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-12-27· cited 52×
- State v. MoranOregon Supreme Court· 1887-06-14· cited 51×
- Covington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1887-10-14· cited 50×
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1903-12-09· cited 43×
- People v. McGarryMichigan Supreme Court· 1904-04-05· cited 38×
- People v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1896-05-28· cited 36×
- Burdick v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court· 1873-11-15· cited 33×
- Shattuck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1859-01-10· cited 31×
- People v. PartonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1875-07-01· cited 30×
- State v. CoffeeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1888-07-07· cited 27×
- State v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court· 1886-04-17· cited 25×
- People v. LundinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-03-18· cited 21×
- Dixon v. RickettsUtah Supreme Court· 1903-06-30· cited 20×
- State v. PottsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1889-10-26· cited 19×
- People v. GieseaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1883-04-27· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.