Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/26/2017
State v. Campbell
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 9251
Syllabus
To support a conviction for a crime by complicity with sufficient evidence, the State may introduce direct or circumstantial evidence from which the finder of fact can infer that the defendant had the requisite criminal intent.
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2001-09-26· cited 585×
- State v. HallerOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-13· cited 264×
- State v. MonroeOhio Supreme Court· 2005-05-25· cited 211×
- State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-10· cited 147×
- State v. PlottOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-09· cited 73×
- State v. ColemanOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-01· cited 53×
- State v. BrentlingerOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-01· cited 41×
- State v. WorthingtonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-16· cited 31×
- State v. RoweOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-07· cited 13×
- State v. PierceOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-12· cited 13×
- State v. SchaefferOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-31· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.