State v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[E]xclusion of evidence is appro- priate only where the violation substantially prejudices the other party in preparing its case for trial and no less severe sanction will obviate the prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dyson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-12-02· cited 29×
• State v. Pilon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-08-31· cited 13×
• City of Bremerton v. Corbett
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-10-25· cited 6×
• State v. Dyson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-06-15· cited 6×
• State v. Mai
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-10-19· cited 4×
• State v. Manzella
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-11-12· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-07-25· cited 31×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-09-07· cited 18×
• State v. Paquin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-01-17· cited 18×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-10-24· cited 10×
• State v. Peters
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-03-05· cited 8×