Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 12/28/1994
State v. Campbell
Citations
- 454 S.E.2d 899
- 317 S.C. 449
- 1994 S.C. App. LEXIS 187
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- by introducing evidence of defendant’s prior cocaine sales, state was attempting to demonstrate that, because he had done so in the past, he was doing so on this occasion, precisely the type of inference Lyle prohibits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howell, Connor, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HoughSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 23×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-09-23· cited 15×
- State v. CulbreathCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-03-18· cited 15×
- State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-28· cited 7×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-11-08· cited 5×
- State v. TuffourCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-05-09· cited 4×
- State v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 4×
- State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.