State v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a “mere assertion . . . is not sufficient to show any error”
• no mistrial when jurors twice advised trial court that they were deadlocked and were advised to continue their deliberations
• counsel could waive defendant’s right to be present during reading of testimony and answering of jury questions, and any error subject to harmless error review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Swoopes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-19· cited 123×
• State v. Webb
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-01-09· cited 21×
• State of Arizona v. Reuben Renee Cota
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-02-25· cited 11×
• State of Arizona v. Samuel Wayne Swoopes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-19

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Chapple
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-11· cited 423×
• State v. Dessureault
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-04-30· cited 227×
• State v. Hicks
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-07-16· cited 68×
• State v. Harding
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-05-30· cited 46×
• State v. Roberts
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-03-12· cited 39×
• State v. Lawrence
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-07-05· cited 31×
• State v. Corrales
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-04-22· cited 25×
• State v. Murray
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-07-02· cited 9×