Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/9/1985
State v. Campbell
Citations
- 339 S.E.2d 109
- 287 S.C. 377
- 1985 S.C. LEXIS 558
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that although malice must be aforethought, malice is not required to exist for any appreciable amount of time before the act is committed
- defining a deadly weapon as any article, substance, or instrument likely to cause death or great bodily harm
- deadly weapon is generally defined as any article, instrument or substance which is likely to produce death or great bodily harm
- “The implication of malice may arise from the use of a deadly weapon. A deadly weapon is generally defined as ‘any article, instrument or substance which is likely to produce death or great bodily harm.’ ”
- The implication of malice may arise from the use of a deadly weapon.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KelseySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-08· cited 143×
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 84×
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-12-01· cited 33×
- State v. ReeseSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-08-07· cited 30×
- State v. NavyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-07-31· cited 10×
- State v. ShandsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-06-13· cited 7×
- State v. HeckCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-05-06· cited 6×
- State v. ScurryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-07-08· cited 5×
- State v. BurdetteSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-07-31
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- State v. ElmoreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-11-01· cited 77×
- People v. MorganMichigan Court of Appeals· 1973-10-31· cited 16×
- In the Interest of Christopher W.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-04-22· cited 11×
- State v. MattisonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-04-22· cited 11×
- Everhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1978-03-07· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.