State v. Camp
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 2964
Syllabus
Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) does not provide a basis for vacating Camp's guilty pleas to gross sexual imposition and rape. While the trial court failed to orally advise Camp regarding a period of mandatory five-year post-release control and the consequences for violating post-release control at his plea hearing, the totality of the circumstances indicate that Camp knew about post-release control and the possible sanctions for violating post-release control. Camp's plea form thoroughly advised Camp about post-release control, and in response to questions from the trial court, Camp indicated that he signed the form, went over its contents with counsel, and understood the entirety of its contents. Since substantial compliance with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) is demonstrated, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 403×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-18· cited 15×
- State v. McDuffieOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-15· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.